NAVIGATION
EXERPTS
SEARCH
-
RECENT POSTS
Tag Archives: historical criticism
The Trinity – Doctrine of Delusion
From the overwhelming evidence that reveals that the orthodox church has corrupted the scriptures by incorporating the doctrine of the Trinity into them is sufficient motive not only to not believe this false doctrine, but also to reject and doubt any other scripture that leads one in this direction.
From what the church fathers have said, and the most recent discoveries of manuscripts about the very first believers in Jesus was that they didn’t believe Jesus was God nor did there occur a so-called miraculous virgin birth, let alone the trinity that they had never even heard of. It was their position that the gospels were being corrupted by the Roman church and they fought to conserve its purity despite persecution.
Many modern day scholars have found substantial amounts of evidence that confirms what the early Jewish believers had been saying. Even as early as the first and second centuries the gospels were being corrupted to fit the doctrines of the new developing church of Rome.
Posted in Who Was Jesus Part 3
Tagged Aethiopic, Against Heresies, agree, apologists, Arabic, Athanasians, Bishops, blood, Caesurae, Christian, Coptic, corruption, corruptions, doctrine, Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics, Eusebius, gospel of Matthew, Gospel of the Hebrews, Greek fathers, Greek manuscripts, historical criticism, holy ghost, illogical, impugned, In my name, interpolations, Irenaeus, Jewish believers, King James Version, literary criticism, manuscripts, New International Version, not genuine, orthodox church, scholars, Sir William Whiston, spurious, Syriac, textual criticism, trinitarian, Trinity, trustworthiness, Vulgate
Comments Off on The Trinity – Doctrine of Delusion